Poughkeepsie Journal: New York's brighter future without
Indian Point

Poughkeepsie Journal: New York's brighter future without
Indian Point

Published:
Monday, July 13, 2015 - 11:18
SUNY Poly News Logo

[caption id="" align="alignright" width="329"] 635720466072592501-Paul-Gallay-at-Croton-Point-Park-crPaulGallay-7-17-14.jpg Paul Gallay (Courtesy Photo)[/caption]

We must face facts regarding the Indian Point nuclear plant. Its infrastructure is aging, its safety is dubious, and most everyone knows it. What many people don't know is that it can be replaced at little cost to ratepayers — and energy technologies taking its place would create new economic opportunities for New York.

Indian Point — just 38 miles north of New York City — is vulnerable to terrorism, has 2,000 tons of radioactive waste packed into leaking pools and relies on an unworkable evacuation plan. While some argue that transformer accidents — such as the one that occurred in May — can happen at any power facility, they happen with astonishing frequency at Indian Point. Its age is problematic: You wouldn't rely on a 40-year-old appliance, why extend this trust to a nuclear plant? Moreover, the Nuclear Regulatory Commission says Indian Point 3 has the highest risk of earthquake damage of all the nation's reactors. About 20 million people live within 50 miles of Indian Point. If a catastrophic accident occurred, the consequences would be unimaginable.

The NRC permits Indian Point to evade its own safety standards requiring that electrical cables controlling emergency reactor shutdowns have insulation that lasts 60 minutes in a fire. When the NRC found that the plant's insulation lasted just 27 minutes, it gave Indian Point an exemption. Your own home likely has more insulation on its electrical cables than does the plant.

Entergy and nuclear-industry groups make spurious claims that skyrocketing energy costs would result from Indian Point's closure. Actually, it can be retired without undermining the state's electric grid. Planning is under way for better efficiencies and cleaner energy sources. The cost to ratepayers will be minimal when compared to the risks, and homeowners could actually see savings in a few years — especially if they make their homes more energy efficient.

Closing Indian Point was pronounced doable by New York state in 2013, and it would bring economic opportunities and create jobs. SolarCity's manufacturing plans in Buffalo are just one signal of the potential.

READ MORE

Other
News